Friday, April 20, 2012

A Prerequisite for any E-Filing Implementation

One of the major difficulties encountered in the implementation of an Electronic Court Case Filing System, is gaining the acceptance of all of the major stakeholders in the process. I have found that the paper driven process in most Court structures has been entrenched for decades, and many of the parties involved would be very happy to continue as they always have. They see little reason for change, and the most important stakeholders in the process are also the most difficult to convince. The Judges and the court staff are under the most pressure in the court filing process, and they must be convinced that E-Filing will help them work more effectively.

Part of the reluctance to change is the lack of computer knowledge and with many judges and court staff having little or no Internet experience in the courtroom. They find it difficult to visualize how to use these technologies in their Courts Process.

The major obstacle to overcome however is the fact that Judges are very effective at their piece of the paper process. Judges are able to move through the stacks of paper very quickly. Up to 90% of the judges work can be handled with a quick look at the key document(s), a quick note of action or a signature, and a route to one of the courts staff for further action. A judge can work through a large stack of paper very quickly, and they don’t see all of the efforts in getting that paper to them, and the back-end efforts in dealing with their notes. Additionally the remaining 10% of their work may require detailed review of multiple large documents which may not lend itself to viewing on a computer screen. Add to this, reduced budgets and increased case loads, where the courts are busier than ever. Bottom line is that any electronic process created for the judges must be as fast as making a few notes on a piece of paper and passing it along to someone else for action.

The Final hurdle to jump is flexibility. I have found that even within a given county, each court is unique in the way they do their work. Some courts take on tasks such as printing and service activities while others pass that on to the Clerks Operation. Some courts have specific titles and defined responsibilities for each staff member while others spread all activities across equally trained and responsible staff. Additionally, variations in the level of authority given to staff, and the structure of judges to include Pro-Tem, Senior Judge, Magistrates, and other court staff such as Facilitators in Mortgage Foreclosure Cases must be supported in a manner that is flexible and yet easy to understand, and adjust.

Any E-Filing System being considered should provide for these objectives of…

·         Speed for the Judges

·         Flexibility for the Courts Staff

·         Overall improved effectiveness in the court filing process

Systems that do not meet these objectives will not be fully accepted by the Judges and Court Staff.

The CourtFileNow System from eCourtSystems Inc. was designed by a Judge. Over a period of many months, the Court processing prototypes were tested and adjusted with input from the Judge and his court staff to meet or exceed the speed, flexibility, and effectiveness requirements.

Benefits of CourtFileNow

Along with all of the traditional benefits that would be expected from an E-Filing System which include

ü  Elimination of paper files and all of the associated storage and access problems and costs

ü  Reduced printing, copying, handling and mailing delays and costs

ü  Reduced data entry due to storing and accessing previously entered data with the added benefit of reduced errors

ü  Seamless integration with the Case Management System such that any update in the E-filing System immediately populates the Case Management System, and Case Management updates populate the E-filing System.

ü  Immediate notification and availability of any activity and information on a case to all participating parties

ü  Reduced efforts in the creation and handling of financial transactions which are all collected and distributed electronically

Benefits specifically for the Courts and Courts Staff

Speed for the Judges

ü  Full access to complete case information including full CCS history and all case documents in as little as two to three clicks

o   Two clicks from a filing event in the judges queue

o   Two clicks from the Judges daily calendar

o   Three clicks to search and view a case

ü  File using a proposed order used verbatim in as little as three clicks

ü  Capability to use and modify a proposed order

ü  Capability to rapidly switch from Court Calendar to Case Detail to Process an Order, or Dispose of a Case or enter a CCS or Schedule an Event

ü  One Click routing or sharing of Case Filings with sticky note comments to any court staff or the clerk

ü  One click viewing of Court Staff queues

ü  Court staff can complete filings up to the point of submission, then save the in process filing for routing to the Judge for final review and submission

ü  Rapid capability to archive or un-archive one or multiple filing events from the active queues

ü  Rapid search capability by Cause Number or by Party Name, or by Attorney Name





Flexibility for the Court Staff

ü  Queues for the work to be performed by the Courts can be established and customized for each Court, for example, queues can be established by type of activity required, such as triage and distribution of incoming filings, scheduling activities, Motions for Default Judgments, Law Clerk activities, communication to attorney firms, etc.

ü  Staff can be assigned to specific queues

ü  Staff can be assigned different responsibilities/titles and different levels of authority, such as a Judge Pro-Tem, or signing authority for the judge, and adjustments to these assignments can be completed immediately online

ü  Court staff has access to viewing other court staff queues

Overall improved effectiveness in the court filing process

ü  Full access to complete case information including full CCS history and all case documents in as little as two to three clicks

o   Two clicks from a filing event in the judges queue

o   Two clicks from the Judges daily calendar

o   Three clicks to search and view a case

ü  One Click routing or sharing of Case Filings with sticky note comments to any court staff, the Judge, or the clerk

ü  One click viewing of Court Staff queues

ü  Court staff can complete filings up to the point of submission, then save the in process filing for routing to the Judge for final review and submission

ü  Rapid capability to archive or un-archive one or multiple filing events from the active queues

ü  Rapid search capability by Cause Number or by Party Name, or by Attorney Name

ü  Court staff can update the Case Management System from the E-Filing System

o   File Orders with CCS updates

o   Update Disposition

o   Schedule an Event

o   Add to the CCS

ü  Route a Court Filing to the Electronic RJO


No comments:

Post a Comment